The prime number exists infinitely or notEukleides Euclid proved that the prime number exists infinitely just like the natural number 2300 years ago in Greece. Let$B!G(Bs go over the proof. First of all, The prime number is just like the atom of number which is the basic number. The prime number is bigger than 1 and can be divided by 1 and itself but can not be divided by any other number. All plus integral number which is the natural number can be expressed by multiple of the prime number. In other words, All numbers can be divided by the prime number. Then, Let$B!G(Bs get into the proof that the prime number exists infinitely by Eukleides Euclid. The following number (N) can be made by each different prime number of $B#q(B _{1}$B!"#q(B_{2}$B!"#q(B_{3}$B!"!&!&!&#q(B_{n}.$B#N!a#q(B _{1}$B!v#q(B_{2}$B!v#q(B_{3}$B!v!&!&!&!v#q(B_{n}$B!!!\#1(BThis number of (N) can not divided by each different prime number of $B#q(B _{1}$B!"#q(B_{2}$B!"#q(B_{3}$B!"!&!&!&#q(B_{n}.It is because the part of $B#q(B _{1}$B!v#q(B_{2}$B!v#q(B_{3}$B!v!&!&!&!v#q(B_{n} can be divided by each $B#q(B_{1}$B!"#q(B_{2}$B!"#q(B_{3}$B!"!&!&!&#q(B_{n} but 1 is always remained.Hence, (1) (N) is different prime number other than prime number of $B#q(B _{1}$B!"#q(B_{2}$B!"#q(B_{3}$B!"!&!&!&#q(B_{n}.Or, (2) (N) must be divided by different prime number other than prime number of $B#q(B _{1}$B!"#q(B_{2}$B!"#q(B_{3}$B!"!&!&!&#q(B_{n}.From the view point of (1) and (2), There is sure another different prime number which is $B#q(B _{$B#n!\#1(B} other than prime number of $B#q(B_{1}$B!"#q(B_{2}$B!"#q(B_{3}$B!"!&!&!&#q(B_{n}.Then, The new prime number such as $B#q(B _{$B#n!\#2(B}$B!"#q(B_{$B#n!\#3(B}$B!"#q(B_{$B#n!\#3(B}$B!"#q(B_{$B#n!\#4(B}$B!&!&!&(Bcan be found out next by next.Hence, The prime number exists infinitely. For example, Let$B!G(Bs take (N) = 3 X 5 + 1 =16 into consideration. 16 can be divided by the prime number of 2 which is different prime number than 3 and 5 because 16 = 2 X 2 X 2 X 2. And, Let$B!G(Bs take (N) = 3 X 5 X 7+ 1 =106 into consideration. 106 can be divided by the prime number of 2 and 53 which are different prime number than 3 and 5 and 7 because 106 = 2 X 53. It looks like very logical. However, We must take deep consideration about the natural number of 1, 2, 3,$B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1. The number of 1, 2, 3,$B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 are not only the prime number but the natural number. Needless to say, The natural number = the prime number + the composite number. Among the natural number of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 4 = 2 X 2, 6 = 2 X 3, 8 = 2 X 2 X 2 X 2. They are composite numbers. Then, The proof that the new prime number such as$B#q(B _{$B#n!\#2(B}$B!"#q(B_{$B#n!\#3(B}$B!"#q(B_{$B#n!\#3(B}$B!"#q(B_{$B#n!\#4(B}$B!&!&!&(Bexist infinitely was made on the basis of the natural number of (n) and (n+1) which is the next number of (n).However, There are no composite numbers such as 4, 6, 8, 9 in the prime number. Hence, The proof that the new prime number such as$B#q(B _{$B#n!\#2(B}$B!"#q(B_{$B#n!\#3(B}$B!"#q(B_{$B#n!\#3(B}$B!"#q(B_{$B#n!\#4(B}$B!&!&!&(Bexist infinitely was not made on the basis of the prime number but made on the basis of the natural number.Needless to say, The proof that the natural number of (n) and (n+1) which is the next number of (n) exist infinitely can be made by (n) and (n+1) which is the next number of (n). In other words, The next natural number is always to be added by 1. This is entirely the reasonable that the prime number exists infinitely on the basis of infinite natural number. However, All prime number can not be expressed by$B#N!a#q(B _{1}$B!v#q(B_{2}$B!v#q(B_{3}$B!v!&!&!&!v#q(B_{n}$B!!!\#1(Bif the prime number does not exist infinitely.This is entirely the proof that the proof by Eukleides Euclid that the prime number exists infinitely is nothing but the game of vicious circle which can not prove that the prime number exists infinitely. Eventually, No human beings can make sure whether the prime number exists infinitely. In paradoxically saying, No human beings can make sure whether the prime number exists finitely. In other words, The world of prime number is nothing but in the world of beyond finite and infinite. Thus, Any superb mathematician will not be able to make formula to express all prime number and nobody can make it unless we go beyond finite and infinite. This is entirely the fact that, The natural number can exist infinitely because the next number of (n) can be expressed as (n+1). On the other hand, The prime number can not exist infinitely because the next prime number can not be expressed. However, The modern scientists have tried hard to find out the formula how to express the next number of prime number of (n) in having believed that the prime number exists infinitely. The reason for this is that Eukleides Euclid proved that the prime number exists infinitely just like the natural number 2300 years ago in Greece. However, The concept of infinite number by Eukleides Euclid was subject to the natural number of which order was infinite such as 1, 2, 3,$B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1. This is entirely the proof that Euclidian geometry was based on the perfect plane. As a matter of fact, The actual total sum of angle in case of triangle is not 180 degrees but more than 180 degrees because the surface of earth is not plane but sphere. What the fact mean? Infinity of the prime number proved by Eukleides Euclid was based on the Euclidian geometry based on the perfect plane. In other words, Infinity of the natural number order of 1, 2, 3,$B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 does not go to the endless point ($B!g(B) but comes back to the original point based on the sphere surface. Hence, The number of 1 (The starting point) comes back to infinite (the ending point). This is entirely the reason why I have asserted that 0 = 1 and the fundamental of number is 0. Thus, It is the truth that 0, 1, 2, 3,$B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 comes back to 0. Then, Even the natural number does not exist infinitely but comes back to 0 (=1) in the actual case of the sphere surface. Hence, Even the natural number has the last number. And, It is called Euclidian space based on the plane surface but is called Riemannian space based on the sphere surface. This is entirely the fact that Riemann Hypothesis was not based on the Euclidian space but the Riemannian space. And, The key for this is that infinity = zero. This is the reason why I wrote the book of [The world of zero]. Then, Let me quote about infinity = zero from my book of [The world of zero] as below. Chapter 1 To philosophize $B!H(Bworld of zero$B!I(B Let$B!G(Bs quote my book $B!H(BThe theory of beyond$B!I(B Vol. (III) Chapter 82 [To philosophize about Zero universe]. You can discard arduous sentence except or last sentence below mentioned. $B!H(BHence, It is nothing but the universe which is static zero space. There is no need to argue about such a complicated equation. There is need to philosophize about Zero universe$B!I(B This book is aiming at not to make science about $B!H(Bthe world of zero$B!I(B but to philosophize about $B!H(Bthe world of zero$B!I(B. To philosophize about Zero universe The universe which keeps expanding. Or, The universe which is expanding and shrinking. These two universes are nothing but imaginary universe. Hence, The universe which does neither keep expanding nor expanding and shrinking is nothing but the static substantial Zero-dimension universe. In other words, It depends on whichever the momentum of pendulum is minimized or maximized. Then, Let$B!G(Bs be reminded of the equation of Albert Einstein as below. $B#G(Bij$B!a#8&P#G(B/$B#C(B ^{4}$B!v#T(BijThe reason why the equation divided into two parts was that, It depends on ($B#T(Bij) which is total mass (total energy) of universe. The degree of twisted universe ($B#G(Bij) > $B!g(B Or, The degree of twisted universe ($B#G(Bij) > $B!g(B In other words, The universe was divided into only, Positive space, Or, Negative space. And, The degree of twisted universe ($B#G(Bij) = $B!g(B was involved with, The degree of twisted universe ($B#G(Bij) > $B!g(B Scientists are quite contradictory. There should be the Zero space universe with, The degree of twisted universe ($B#G(Bij) = $B!g(B In other words, The degree of twisted universe ($B#G(Bij) = $B!g(B = Zero universe is nothing but the static universe. Then, What does the degree of twisted universe ($B#G(Bij) = $B!g(B = Zero universe mean? Needless to say, Total mass (Total energy) is nothing but infinite which is zero. In other words, It is nothing but the universe without the starting point and the ending point. Hence, It is nothing but the universe which is static zero space. There is no need to argue about such a complicated equation. There is need to philosophize about Zero universe. Chapter 2 To philosophize beyond unified theory Modern science has succeeded to unify electromagnetic force and weak nuclear force which is called the unified theory. And, It is very close for them to unify strong nuclear force on both electromagnetic force and weak nuclear force which is called the great unified theory. However, It is almost impossible to unify gravitational force on strong nuclear force and electromagnetic force and weak nuclear force which is called the super great unified theory. Hence, Modern scientist can not match super great unified force theory at all. The reason for this is that, Super great unified force theory can not be made scientifically but can be philosophized. It is because that the world of Zero (Zero universe) must only be philosophized. Acceleration of free fall = Infinite velocityWhat does the degree of twisted universe ($B#G(Bij) = $B!g(B mean? Needless to say, Total mass (Total energy) = ($B#T(Bij)is nothing but infinite. Then, Mass (m) is nothing but force (F). In other words, Equation of motion by Isaac Newton which is that, F = m $B&A(B Then, Total mass (Total energy) = ($B#T(Bij) = infinite is nothing but that, Gravity (F) is nothing but infinite as Isaac Newton asserted. In paradoxically saying, Total mass (Total energy) = ($B#T(Bij) = infinite = zero says that, Gravity (F) = infinite = zero. This is entirely the key that infinite = zero. Hence, Among four kinds of force which is gravity and electromagnetic force and weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force, The macro universe world consisted of gravity must not be involved by the micro quantum world consisted of electromagnetic force and weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force, But, The micro quantum world consisted of electromagnetic force and weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force must be involved by the macro universe world consisted of gravity. Eventually, Unified force theory which is to be unified with electromagnetic force and weak nuclear force is useless. Great unified force theory which is to be unified with electromagnetic force and weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force is useless. Otherwise, Super great unified force theory which is to be unified with gravity and electromagnetic force and weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force is useful. However, Modern scientist can not match super great unified force theory at all. The reason for this is that, Super great unified force theory can not be made scientifically but can be philosophized. It is because that the world of Zero (Zero universe) must only be philosophized. Chapter 3 To philosophize is insightModern human beings have forgotten to think about themselves. It is because they have not believed to survive without self-assertion. Hence, They pretend. The more they pretend the less mature their insight. This is entirely the result that we human beings have been seeking for the imaginary world and getting rid of the substantial world. To seek for $B!H(Bthe world of zero$B!I(B is nothing but to mature insight. Zero-dimensional world = Internal selfZero-dimensional universe is nothing but substantial world. Dimensional universe is nothing but imaginary world. And, Zero = Infinite. In other words, The starting point = The ending point. This is entirely the proof that, 0 = $B!g(B. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are nothing but images. Hence, Not only, Micro universe (Quantum world), But also, Micro universe (Space world), But also, Medium universe (human world), are all imaginary worlds. Take a room for instance, Walls are image and space (emptiness = hollowness) surrounded by walls is substance. However, We human beings have misunderstood that walls are self. However, Space (emptiness = hollowness) surrounded by walls is real self. We human beings are enthusiastic for figure or quality or color of walls because we have misunderstood that wall is self. In another expression, We human beings have been enthusiastic for clothing and accessory around us and forgotten internal real self. Hence, Dimensional world is nothing but the world of walls. Dimensional world is nothing but the world of clothing and accessory. Zero-dimensional world is nothing but the world of space (emptiness = hollowness) surrounded by walls. Zero-dimensional world is nothing but internal real self. Chapter 4 To science & To philosophizeScience is based on mathematic and it is impossible for science to be without mathematic. And, The base of mathematic is nothing but the concept of zero. However, We human beings who made science had made crucial mistake. Science has not been seeking for the concept of zero but the concept of figure. In other words, Science has been seeking for 1+1=2, 1+2=3, 1+3=4, 1+4=5, 1+5=6, 1+6=7, 1+7=8 and 1+8=9. However, Science has not been seeking for 1+9=10. This is indeed the fact that, 1+1=2, 1+2=3, 1+3=4, 1+4=5, 1+5=6, 1+6=7, 1+7=8 and 1+8=9 is the world to science. However, 1+9=10 is the world to philosophize. Zero = nothing = substance & Figure = thing = imageZero-dimensional world is nothing but the world of space (emptiness = hollowness) surrounded by walls. Zero-dimensional world is nothing but internal real self. In other words, Zero-dimensional world is nothing but substantial world. In final, Zero = substance. On the other hand, Dimensional world is nothing but the world of walls. Dimensional world is nothing but the world of clothing and accessory. In other words, Dimensional world is nothing but imaginary world. In final, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 = image. Hence, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 = image, is just absent concept of, Zero = substance. Then, What dose it show? All figures are starting from zero to ending at zero. This is entirely the proof that zero is the basis of all mathematics. If zero is taken away the whole structure of mathematics falls down. The whole event starts with zero. For instance, You add one zero to the figure of 1, Then, The value of zero is nine. It is because immediately one becomes 10. 9 is born out of zero immediately. You add two zeros to 1, Then, The value is 99, And, Immediately 1 becomes 100. The whole structure of mathematics builds up out of zero. Hence, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 = image, is just absent concept of, Zero = substance. Hence, The natural number of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bis just absent concept of Zero = substance. And, The prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B is Zero = substance. Thus, There has been Zero and the second One in the beginning as well as in the ending among the prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B. Therefore, The identity of prime number is Zero, One 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(BOne, Zero. Then, The natural number of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bhas also the last number, One, Zero. Thus, The real meaning of infinity and finitude is going to be figured out. In another expression, The infinite number is surrounded by finite number of Zero and One in the beginning and in the ending circularly returned. Thus, The infinite natural number of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(B is surrounded by finite number of Zero and One in the beginning and in the ending circularly returned. On the other hand, The infinite prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 $B!&!&!&(B is surrounded by finite number of Zero and One in the beginning and in the ending circularly returned. This is entirely the truth that there is not finite in the infinite but infinite in the finite. However, We have believed that there is finite in the infinite. Then, The infinite prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 $B!&!&!&(B can be expressed by a certain formula just like that the infinite natural number of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bcan be expressed by formula of (n + 1). And, There is clue of a certain formula which circular return to One and Zero. Then, Let$B!G(Bs go over about One and Zero. First of all, It is needless to say that we must go over about One and Zero by not Euclidian space but Riemannian space. Therefore, Let$B!G(Bs go over from the view point of circular motion of the starting point $B"*(B the circumference $B"*(B the ending point. As previously stated, The infinite prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 $B!&!&!&(B can be expressed by a certain formula just like that the infinite natural number of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bcan be expressed by formula of (n + 1). Hence, Zero, One, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(BOne, Zero is nothing but the natural number which goes beyond infinite and finite. On the other hand, Zero, One, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 $B!&!&!&(BOne, Zero nothing but the prime number which goes beyond infinite and finite. What does it mean? Zero and One is the starting point. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bwhich is infinite natural number is the circumference. Or, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 $B!&!&!&(Bwhich is infinite prime number is the circumference. One and Zero is the ending point. In other words, The starting point and the ending point have Zero in common. The starting point and the ending point have reverse direction in difference. This is entirely the fact that, Zero is the starting point as well as the ending point. One is a link to the circumference. Secondly, The essence of circumference is motion line which has infinity. In other words, The essence of circumference is an image. On the other hand, The essence of the starting point and the ending point is static point which has finitude. In other words, The essence of the starting point and the ending point is substantial. Hence, Static point = substance = finitude. Motion line = image = infinity. Then, The real meaning of infinity and finitude is going to be figured out a little bit. And, Zero is the starting point as well as the ending point. In other words, Zero is nothing (the starting point) as well as everything (the ending point). On the other hand, One is the bridge from the starting point and to the ending point. In other words, One is the bridge in between infinity and finitude. This is entirely the proof that One is nothing but the event horizon (the singular point). In another expression, The concept of number is just the tool for men to express about the universe. In paradoxically saying, Men should understand the concept of number so that men can understand the universe. And, The fundamental of fundamentals on the concept of number is Zero. And, The application of fundamentals on the concept of number is One. And, Application of applications on the concept of number is nothing but the prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 $B!&!&!&(B which exists infinitely. However, Men distorted the concept of number at there own accord. As a result, Men have forged the natural number of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bin malfunction of the concept of number. To make matter worse, Men have named wrongly as the natural number. As a result, Men can not understand about the way of being universe. On the other hand, Other creations than men which has no concept of number can understand that, The way of being nature, The way of being earth, The way of being universe, And, The way of being nature, The way of being earth, The way of being universe, is very simple to understand. Hence, The way of being nature, The way of being earth, The way of being universe, which is very simple to understand can be set just only by understanding the fundamental of the concept of number which is Zero and One. However, Men distorted the concept of number at there own accord. As a result, Men have forged the natural number of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bin malfunction of the concept of number. As a result, Men distorted that they can not understand about, The way of being nature, The way of being earth, The way of being universe, unless they can understand about application of the concept of number. In other words, Men distorted that only specialists and scientists who can understand about application of the concept of number can understand about, The way of being nature, The way of being earth, The way of being universe. As a result, General people can not understand about, The way of being nature, The way of being earth, The way of being universe. This is entirely the meaning of the book [A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME] written by Stephen Hawking that, If we do discover a complete theory, it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just a few scientists. Hence, Everybody can understand about, The way of being nature, The way of being earth, The way of being universe if Zero and One which are the fundamental of concept of number can be understood. And, The book [A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME] written by Stephen Hawking ended as below. Until now, scientists have been sticking the new theory in asking what is universe but could not ask why. On the other hand, philosophers who have been doing business in asking why could not follow the development of science theory. Until 18th century, philosophers were very proud of arguing about the universe including science as philosophy. However, at the 19th and 20th century, science had been developed too technologically and mathematically for anybody else including philosophers to understand$B!I(B Philosophers researching sphere had become very narrow at 20th century and Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein who was the greatest philosopher in the 20th century said that $B!H(BThe only duty for remaining philosophy is to analyze about language$B!I(B. What a miserable decline the conventional philosophy since Aristotle into Kant! If we do discover a complete theory, it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just a few scientists. Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists, and just ordinary people, be able to take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and the universe exist. If we find the answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason - for then we would know the mind of God. This is entirely the proof that, The 21st century shall be the age that the argument about the issue of man and universe is about to be taken over by ordinary man from philosophers and scientists. And, The key is the infinite prime number which is in between Zero and One. Hence, Is the sequence of Zero, One, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(BOne, Zero is supposed to be very simple about, The way of being nature, The way of being earth, The way of being universe? And, A certain formula must be found out to verify the infinity of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B. However, No certain formula could be found to express all the prime number until today. Then, Why does the prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(Bnot include number 0 & 1 although the natural number of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bincludes number 1? And, Is it wrong for the prime number to include number 0 & 1? Then,. Number 0 & 1 must be the key to solve. Then, Let$B!G(Bs get into the theme of Riemann Hypothesis. Riemann Hypothesis is about that, There must be a certain prime number in between natural number of n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1)^{2}$B!!(B.This is entirely the two kinds of premises below mentioned. (1) The natural number of (n) is the base. (2) The natural number of (n) is the base that the next number of (n) is (n+1). Hence, Number 1 is the key. However, Number 1 which has the key is not One. And, There is Zero which is the fundamental of fundamentals of the concept of number. Hence, The definition about infinity and finitude must be made not by the basis of natural number of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bbut by the basis of prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B in order to verify that the prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(Bexists infinitely. Then, What is infinity and finitude on basis of prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B? Previously, What is infinity and finitude on basis of natural number of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(B? Then, There are twin prime numbers. 3 and 5 5 and 7 11 and 13 These are twin prime numbers. In another expression, A composite number enter into in between two kinds of prime number which are called twin prime numbers. Hence, 7 and 11 are not twin prime numbers. It is because there are three kinds of composite numbers 8, 9 and 10 in between 7 and 11. Then, Let$B!G(Bs remember Riemann hypothesis. There must be a certain prime number in between natural number of n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1)^{2}$B!!(B.Then, Take 3 and 5 prime number for instance, There are five kinds of prime numbers 11, 13, 17, 19 and 23 in between 3 ^{2}$B!!(B = 9 and 5^{2}$B!!(B= 25.In other words, There is no prime number in between 3 and 5 but five kinds of prime numbers 11, 13, 17, 19 and 23 in between 3 ^{2}$B!!(Band 5^{2}.Then, Let$B!G(Bs remember the definition of prime number. The prime number is just like the atom of number which is the basic number. The prime number is bigger than 1 and can be divided by 1 and itself but can not be divided by any other number. All plus integral number which is the natural number can be expressed by multiple of the prime number. In other words, All numbers can be divided by the prime number. In simply saying, (1) The prime number is bigger than 1 and can be divided by 1 and itself but can not be divided by any other number. (2) The natural number (The prime numbers + the composite numbers) can surely be divided by a certain prime number. (3) The composite numbers are the numbers which multiply by each of prime number. Then, Let$B!G(Bs go over Riemann Hypothesis to be divided the natural number into the prime + the composite number. There must be a certain prime number in between natural number of n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1) ^{2}$B!!(B.Hence, There must be a certain prime number in between natural number of (the prime number) ^{2}$B!!(Band (the next prime number) ^{2}$B!!(B.And, There must be a certain prime number in between natural number of (the composite number) ^{2}$B!!(Band (the next composite number) ^{2}$B!!(B.Then, There is very important point to be recognized. Thus, The prime number and the next prime number must be twin prime number. Furthermore, The composite number and the next composite number must be twin composite number. The reason for this is that, If the relationship between the natural number of (n) & (n + 1) must be expressed by the natural number = the prime number + the composite number, the relationship between the prime number of (n) & (n + 1) and the composite number of (n) & (n + 1) must be divided. Hence, The next natural number can be added by 1 into the prime number. But, The next prime number can not be added by 1 into the prime number. And, The next composite number can not be added by 1 into the composite number. Then, Let$B!G(Bs get change 1 into One so that the natural number divided into the prime number plus the composite number. Therefore, The next prime number of the prime number (n) is to be (n + One). And, The next composite number of the composite number (n) is to be (n + One). Then, Riemann Hypothesis is about that, There must be a certain prime number in between natural number of n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1) ^{2}$B!!(B.$B"*(B Riemann Hypothesis is about that, There must be a certain prime number in between natural number of n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + One) ^{2}$B!!(B.This will be entirely the proof that 1 in nothing but One. Hence, The natural number is nothing but One, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, One-Zero $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+ One $B!&!&!&(B. Hence, Riemann Hypothesis is about that, There must be a certain prime number in between prime number of n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1) ^{2}$B!!(B.It is because the prime number is one of natural number. Similarly, There must be a certain prime number in between composite number of n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1) ^{2}$B!!(B.It is because the composite number is one of natural number. As stated before, The definition about infinity and finitude must be made not by the basis of natural number of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bbut by the basis of prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B in order to verify that the prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(Bexists infinitely. On the other hand, Riemann Hypothesis is about that, There must be a certain prime number in between natural number of n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1) ^{2}$B!!(B.This is entirely the two kinds of premises below mentioned. (3) The natural number of (n) is the base. (4) The natural number of (n) is the base that the next number of (n) is (n+1). What does the fact means? It means that, There is not any natural number between the natural number (n) and (n + 1). In another expression, There is not any natural number in case of (n + 1) - (n) = 1. On the other hand, How many natural numbers in between n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1) ^{2}$B!!(B?In another expression, There are 2n natural numbers in case of (n + 1) ^{2} - n^{2}$B!!(B=2n + 1.And, There is sure to be one prime number at least among 2n natural numbers. Then, In case of the natural number = 1, 2 X 1 + 1 = 3 Hence, There are two natural numbers. Thus, In case of the natural number = 1, There are two natural numbers which are 2 & 3 and there are two independent prime numbers which are 2 & 3 in between 1 ^{2} = 1 and (1 + 1) ^{2} = 4.And, In case of the natural number = 2, 2 X 2 + 1 = 5 Hence, There are four natural numbers. Thus, In case of the natural number = 2, There are four natural numbers which are 5, 6, 7 and 8 and there is one twin prime number (two prime numbers) which is 5 & 7 in between 2 ^{2} = 4 and (2 + 1) ^{2} = 9.And, In case of the natural number = 3, 2 X 3 + 1 = 7 Hence, There are six natural numbers. Thus, In case of the natural number = 3, There are six natural numbers which are 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 and there one there is one twin prime number (two prime numbers) which is 11 & 13 in between 3 ^{2} = 9 and (3 + 1) ^{2} = 16.And, In case of the natural number =4, 2 X 4 + 1 = 9 Hence, There are eight natural numbers. Thus, In case of the natural number = 4, There are eight natural numbers which are 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24 and there is one twin prime number (two prime numbers) which is 17 & 19 and one independent prime number which is 23 in between 4 ^{2} = 16 and (4 + 1) ^{2} = 25.And, In case of the natural number =5, 2 X 5 + 1 = 11 Hence, There are ten natural numbers. Thus, In case of the natural number = 5, There are ten natural numbers which are 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 and there is one twin prime number (two prime numbers) which is 29 & 31 in between 5 ^{2} = 25 and (5 + 1) ^{2} = 36.And, In case of the natural number =6, 2 X 6 + 1 = 13 Hence, There are twelve natural numbers. Thus, In case of the natural number = 6, There are twelve natural numbers which are 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 and 48 and there is one twin prime number (two prime numbers) which is 41 & 43 and two independent prime numbers which are 37 and 47 in between 6 ^{2} = 36 and (6 + 1) ^{2} = 49.And, In case of the natural number =7, 2 X 7 + 1 = 15 Hence, There are fourteen natural numbers. Thus, In case of the natural number = 7, There are fourteen natural numbers which are 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 and 63 and there is one twin prime number (two prime numbers) which is 59 & 61 and one independent prime number which is 53 in between 7 ^{2} = 49 and (7 + 1) ^{2} = 64.And, In case of the natural number =8, 2 X 8 + 1 = 17 Hence, There are sixteen natural numbers. Thus, In case of the natural number = 8, There are sixteen natural numbers which are 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 80 and there are two twin prime numbers (four prime numbers) which are 65 & 67 and 71 & 73 and one independent prime number which is 79 in between 8 ^{2} = 64 and (8 + 1) ^{2} = 81.And, In case of the natural number =9, 2 X 9 + 1 = 19 Hence, There are eighteen natural numbers. Thus, In case of the natural number = 8, There are sixteen natural numbers which are 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98 and 99 and there is one two twin prime number (two prime numbers) which is 89 & 91 and one independent prime number which is 97 in between 9 ^{2} = 81 and (9 + 1) ^{2} = 100.What does the fact show? Riemann Hypothesis is about that, There must be a certain prime number in between natural number of n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1) ^{2}$B!!(B.And, It shows that there is not any law other than this hypothesis. In paradoxically saying, A certain formula must be found out to verify the infinity of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B. However, No certain formula could be found to express all the prime number until today. And, As Riemann predicted, There will be no formula to express all kinds of prime number eternally. This is entirely the proof that the world of natural number is the world of one-dimensional line. About 500 years ago, The human society had believed that the horizon is eternally straight ahead until Nicolas Copernicus and Galileo Galilei was claiming that the earth was round. Hence, The Roman Vatican tried to crucify Galileo Galilei. Thus, All religions believe the world of the world of one-dimensional line. The reason for this is that god which is the core of religion has to have the eternity. In paradoxically saying, It is god which is infinite and it is not god which is finite. However, It is now common sense that the earth is not infinite but finite. However, Most of human beings have believed the god. Hence, Tremendous amount of religion is appearing day by day. Hence, To believe in god is nothing but to believe that this world is the world of one-dimensional line. This is entirely the proof of the world of Euclidian space. On the contrary, All scientists have believed in the proof by Eukleides Euclid that the prime number exists infinitely even now. To make matter worse, They must have known that Euclidian space is not practical. This is entirely the proof that scientists can not see the forest for the trees. In other words, Scientists are typical human beings with partial view. And, We general peoples without special knowledge have lived a life with partial view because we believe in scientists who have special knowledge. The universe, The earth, The nature, are nothing but the world of total feeling. In another expression, The universe, The earth, The nature, are not the world of natural number but the world of prime number. In another expression, The universe, The earth, The nature, are not the world of one-dimensional world (line) but the world of two-dimensional world (round). It is because that, The universe, The earth, The nature, are the world of three-dimensional cube in where the motion is two-dimensional curve (plane = round). Then, We must say about the mathematics which men had invented on the basis of the world of two-dimensional curve (plane = round). What does the fact mean? We must say about the number which men had invented not on the basis of the world of one-dimensional straight line but on the basis of the number which makes circular motion. In other words, To say about the one-dimensional straight line mathematics is nothing but to go for wool and come home shorn. It is because even mathematics was invented for our actual life. Then, What is the difference between below these? The world of mathematics based on the infinite number, And, The world of mathematics based on the finite number. In other words, What is the difference between below these? The world of mathematics based on the one-dimensional straight line number, And, The world of mathematics based on the two-dimensional curve (plane = round) number. Then, Let$B!G(Bs express the formula of one-dimensional straight line. Hence, Y = a X + b Hence, Euclidian space was based on the one-dimensional straight line motion on the two-dimensional plane. Hence, Euclidian space is impractical. On the other hand, X ^{2} + Y^{2} = R^{2}Riemann space was based on the two-dimensional plane motion on the three-dimensional cube. Hence, Riemann space is practical. Thus, Did Riemann think of below these? The universe, The earth, The nature, could not be practical on the basis of impractical one-dimensional straight line natural number of (n) & (n + 1). And, Did Riemann think of below these? The universe, The earth, The nature, had to be practically expressed on the basis of practical two-dimensional curve (plane = round). Hence, Riemann made hypothesis by n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1) ^{2}$B!!(B with the natural number of (n).And, Riemann Hypothesis is about that, There must be a certain prime number in between natural number of n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1) ^{2}$B!!(B.This is entirely the two kinds of premises below mentioned. (1) The natural number of (n) is the base. (2) The natural number of (n) is the base that the next number of (n) is (n+1). Therefore, Did Riemann predict that the prime number was nothing but the one of two-dimensional curve (plane = round) number with circular motion? Thus, The prime number can be argued only in the world of square. In other words, Mathematics must be practically argued on the basis of prime number which is the number of two-dimensional curve (plane = round) number with circular motion. And, There is very famous formula on the special relative theory by Albert Einstein. E = m C ^{2}$B!!(BE (Energy) is the multiple with m (mass) and C ^{2} (square of velocity of light).Then, How come with C ^{2} (square of velocity of light)?To make matter worse, There is very famous formula on the general relative theory by Albert Einstein. $B#G(Bij$B!a#8&P#G(B/$B#C(B ^{4}$B!v#T(Bij$B#G(Bij (distortion of spacetime) is the multiple of$B#T(Bij (total energy of spacetime) and $B#8&P#G(B(G = gravitation constant) divided by C ^{4} (square of square of velocity of light).Then, How come with C ^{4} (square of square velocity of light)?Albert Einstein must have thought that to argue about the universe on the basis of impractical one-dimensional straight line natural number is impractical. In another expression, Albert Einstein must have thought that to argue about, The universe, The earth, The nature, on the basis of E = m C is impractical. And, Albert Einstein must have thought that to argue about, The universe, The earth, The nature, on the basis of$B#G(Bij$B!a#8&P#G(B/$B#C!v#T(Bij is impractical. Hence, He must have made C ^{2} (square of velocity of light).Hence, He must have made C ^{4} (square of square velocity of light).The reason for this is that, To make square is nothing but to transit dimensional quadrant into other quadrant by 90 degrees. The reason for this is that, To make square of square is nothing but to transit dimensional quadrant into other quadrant by 270 degrees. Hence, It must be circular motion. It is because that, The complex number of (a + bi) transits from the first quadrant into the second quadrant with the complex number of (-b + ai) by multiple the imaginary number of (i) into the complex number of (a + bi). And, The complex number of (-b + ai) transits from the second quadrant into the third quadrant with the complex number of (-a - bi) by multiple the imaginary number of (i) into the complex number of (-b + ai). And, The complex number of (-a - bi) transits from the third quadrant into the fourth quadrant with the complex number of (b - ai) by multiple the imaginary number of (i) into the complex number of (-a - bi). Hence, It must be argued on the basis of circular moving two-dimensional curve (plane = round) which is according to the prime number. And more, The uncertainty principle which is the absolute law by Werner Karl Heisenberg must be focused in the quantum physics arguing about the micro world. Then, The theory of relativity and the uncertainty principle were two stars in the 20th century science. However, The theory of relativity and the uncertainty principle are quite contradictory theory. And, The key is the uncertainty principle by Werner Karl Heisenberg. Then, What is on earth the uncertainty principle by Werner Karl Heisenberg? It said that, The position of moving object is not certain and the velocity of static object is not certain. In another expression, All moving objects are not certain but to be said as probability. In simply saying, The universe, The earth, The nature, are not happening inevitably but happening incidentally. Hence, The theory of relativity by Albert Einstein was what all about, The universe, The earth, The nature, are all happening inevitably but not happening incidentally. This is entirely the reason why Albert Einstein screamed against Werner Karl Heisenberg with very famous proverb $B!H(BDer Alte w$(D+d(Brfelt nicht$B!H(B. Hence, The theory of relativity by Albert Einstein was what all about, The universe, The earth, The nature, are the assertion that all above were created by god. On the other hand, The uncertainty principle by Werner Karl Heisenberg was what all about, The universe, The earth, The nature, are the assertion that all above were created incidentally. Then, What did these two stars in the world of science show? This is entirely the proof that, The theory of relativity by Albert Einstein was what all about, The universe, The earth, The nature, are the assertion that all above were created by infinite natural number. On the other hand, The uncertainty principle by Werner Karl Heisenberg was what all about, The universe, The earth, The nature, are the assertion that all above were created incidentally by finite prime number. Although the two stars of the theory of relativity and uncertainty principle are against each other, However, There are two kinds of theory. One of them is the path integral formulation by Richard Feynman. One of them is the wave function by Erwin Schrödinger. This is entirely the proof that these two studies proved that all above were made by probability incidentally. And, The complex number of (a + bi) is decisive factor so that we can calculate the probability in the incidental world and it is impossible to make calculation without the imaginary number of (i). Thus, The imaginary number of (i) ^{2} is impractical number.This is entirely the fact that, Impractical number is practical. By contraries, Practical number is impractical. Then, What does the fact mean? This is entirely the proof that, The impractical prime number is nothing but practical. By contraries, The practical natural number is nothing but impractical. Then, The prime number = Practical The natural number = Impractical Hence, The theory of relativity, And, The uncertainty principle, are against each other. And, The natural number, And, The prime number, are against each other. Then, The next natural number of the natural number of (n) can be expressed by (n + 1) infinitely. Thus, The next prime number of the prime number of (n) can not be expressed because of finitude. Then, Let$B!G(Bs go over the infinite prime number among the finite. Then, Let$B!G(Bs remember the previous clause as below. Therefore, The identity of prime number is Zero, One 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(BOne, Zero. Then, The natural number of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bhas also the last number, One, Zero. Thus, The real meaning of infinity and finitude is going to be figured out. In another expression, The infinite number is surrounded by finite number of Zero and One in the beginning and in the ending circularly returned. Thus, The infinite natural number of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(B is surrounded by finite number of Zero and One in the beginning and in the ending circularly returned. On the other hand, The infinite prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 $B!&!&!&(B is surrounded by finite number of Zero and One in the beginning and in the ending circularly returned. This is entirely the truth that there is not finite in the infinite but infinite in the finite. However, We have believed that there is finite in the infinite. Let$B!G(Bs remember the previous clause as below. Then, The infinite prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 $B!&!&!&(B can be expressed by a certain formula just like that the infinite natural number of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bcan be expressed by formula of (n + 1). And, There is clue of a certain formula which circular return to One and Zero. Then, Let$B!G(Bs go over about One and Zero. First of all, It is needless to say that we must go over about One and Zero by not Euclidian space but Riemannian space. Therefore, Let$B!G(Bs go over from the view point of circular motion of the starting point $B"*(B the circumference $B"*(B the ending point. As previously stated, The infinite prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 $B!&!&!&(B can be expressed by a certain formula just like that the infinite natural number of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bcan be expressed by formula of (n + 1). Hence, Zero, One, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(BOne, Zero is nothing but the natural number which goes beyond infinite and finite. On the other hand, Zero, One, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 $B!&!&!&(BOne, Zero nothing but the prime number which goes beyond infinite and finite. What does it mean? Zero and One is the starting point. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 $B!&!&!&(Bn, n+1 $B!&!&!&(Bwhich is infinite natural number is the circumference. Or, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 $B!&!&!&(Bwhich is infinite prime number is the circumference. One and Zero is the ending point. In other words, The starting point and the ending point have Zero in common. The starting point and the ending point have reverse direction in difference. This is entirely the fact that, Zero is the starting point as well as the ending point. One is a link to the circumference. Secondly, The essence of circumference is motion line which has infinity. In other words, The essence of circumference is an image. On the other hand, The essence of the starting point and the ending point is static point which has finitude. In other words, The essence of the starting point and the ending point is substantial. Hence, Static point = substance = finitude. Motion line = image = infinity. Then, The real meaning of infinity and finitude is going to be figured out a little bit. And, Zero is the starting point as well as the ending point. In other words, Zero is nothing (the starting point) as well as everything (the ending point). On the other hand, One is the bridge from the starting point and to the ending point. In other words, One is the bridge in between infinity and finitude. This is entirely the proof that One is nothing but the event horizon (the singular point). Hence, The border line between The world of common sense And The world of uncommon sense is nothing but the event horizon (the singular point) which is One. And, The world of common sense is the circumference, And, The world of uncommon sense is the starting point as well as the ending point which is Zero. Then, The infinite world has become the world of common sense. And, The finite world has become the world of uncommon sense. Otherwise, The human beings have believed so? As a matter of fact, The human beings have believed that, The infinite world is the world of uncommon sense. And, The finite world is the world of common sense. This is entirely the proof that, The human society is upside-down common sense. Hence, The human common sense is uncommon sense of The universe, The earth, The nature. By contraries, The common sense of The universe, The earth, The nature, is nothing but the uncommon sense of human beings. Hence, The infinite world is the world of uncommon sense. And, The finite world is the world of common sense. In another expression, The world of infinite prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B = The world of common sense On the other hand, The world of Zero = The world of uncommon sense And, The world of One = The border line between the world of common sense and the world of uncommon sense which is the event horizon (the singular point) Hence, The world of common sense = The infinite world of prime number is to expand into the world of uncommon sense = the world of Zero through the border line between the world of common sense and the world of uncommon sense which is the event horizon (the singular point). What does the fact show? The first thing to be understood is that, We must go beyond the event horizon (the singular point) so that we can reach the world of uncommon sense = the world of Zero. In another expression, We must go beyond the common sense. In other words, The world of infinite prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B must go beyond common sense. Then, What is the common sense which the world of infinite prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B must go beyond? This is entirely the proof that, The infinite natural number of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 10$B!&!&!&(Bn, (n + 1)$B!&!&!&(B is nothing but the world of common sense. Then, Let$B!G(Bs get into the common sense of the infinite world of natural number. Hence, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10$B!&!&!&(Bn, (n + 1)$B!&!&!&(B is the infinite natural number. Therefore, The next number of natural number can be added by 1 which is the common sense of the infinite world of natural number. And, 1 + 1 = 2, 2 + 1 = 3, 3 + 1 = 4$B!&!&!&(B is nothing but the common sense of $B!&!&!&(Bthe infinite world of natural number. On the other hand, 1 + 1 = 2 and 2 + 1 = 3 are common sense of the infinite world of prime number but 3 + 1 = 4 is not the common sense of the infinite world of prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B. 3 + One = 5 is the common sense of the infinite world of prime number. Hence, The prime number of One is to be the natural number of 2. Hence, The natural number (2) = the prime number (One) And, 5 + One = 7 is common sense. Hence, The natural number (2) = the prime number (One) This is entirely the proof that, The next prime number of (n) is to be (n + One) in order to express twin prime number of 3, 5, 7. Hence, The next prime number of (n) is to be (n + One) if all the prime numbers are twin numbers. This is entirely as same expression about the prime number as the natural number just like the next natural number of (n) is to be expressed by (n + 1). However, The next prime number of 5 is 11. Thus, The next prime number of (n) can not be (n + One). However, For the time being, This matter can be ignored. The matter as a matter of fact is that, How to return back just like Zero, One, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B(n), (n + One) $B!&!&!&(BOne, Zero? Eventually, (n) must be 0 because (n + One) has become One and One return back to Zero. This is entirely the proof that, Infinite = 0 In another expression, $B!g!!(B= 0 Hence, Under the conditions as below that, The prime number (One) = the natural number (2) The prime number (One) $B"*(B Zero The natural number ($B!g(B) = the natural number (0) The next infinite prime number just like 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 $B!&!&!&(Bof (n) can be expressed by (n + One). This is entirely the fact that, Riemann Hypothesis is about that, There must be a certain prime number in between natural number of n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1) ^{2}$B!!(B.This is entirely the two kinds of premises below mentioned. (1) The natural number of (n) is the base. (2) The natural number of (n) is the base that the next number of (n) is (n+1). Hence, Number 1 is the key. However, Number 1 which has the key is not One. And, There is Zero which is the fundamental of fundamentals of the concept of number. And, There is not any natural number between the natural number (n) and (n + 1). In another expression, There is not any natural number in case of (n + 1) - (n) = 1. On the other hand, How many natural numbers in between n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1) ^{2}$B!!(B?In another expression, There are 2n natural numbers in case of (n + 1) ^{2} - n^{2}$B!!(B=2n + 1.And, There is sure to be one prime number at least among 2n natural numbers. Riemann Hypothesis is about that, There must be a certain prime number in between natural number of n ^{2}$B!!(B and (n + 1) ^{2}$B!!(B.And, The universe has evolved on the basis of 2n kinds of natural number. However, The universe has evolved on the basis of 2n $B"*(B 2 ^{2}$B!!(B.This is entirely the proof that, (n + 1) ^{2} - n^{2}$B!!(B=2n + 1 and 2n is an evolving coefficient.Then, Let$B!G(Bs quote my book [The Absolute Cosmos (The law of absolute)] as below. Chapter 31 Evolution for a mankindThe dawn for a mankind was two legs Early Man (Homo erectus) 500,000 years ago, and before that time was not a mankind but the ape man (Australopithecus). The Old Man (Neanderthal) who was the 20th generation was born as one of mutation among the Early Man (Homo erectus). The 20th generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{20}= 1, 047, 576 human beings.Further more, The population was 5 million 10,000 years ago. It is the turning point between 22nd and 23rd generations because the number of New Man was approximately 5 million born as the newer species from the Old Man 10,000 years ago. The 21st generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{21}= 2, 097, 152 human beings.The 22nd generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{22}= 4, 194, 304 human beings.The 23rd generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{23}= 8, 388, 608 human beings.It is the turning point between 26th and 27th generations because the number of New Man (Homo sapiens) who is the founder of our mankind switched over from the hunting type life to the farming type life 10,000 years ago was approximately 87 million in 4000 B.C by rapid expansion. The 26th generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{26}= 67, 108, 864 human beings.The 27th generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{27}= 134, 217, 728 human beings.It is the turning point between 28th and 29th generations because the number of mankind is 300 million in 0 A.D. The 28th generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{28}= 268, 435, 456 human beings.The 29th generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{29}= 536, 870, 912 human beings.There wasn$B!G(Bt any turning point during from 0 A.D and 1500 A.D because the number of mankind in 1500 A.D. was 430 million which didn't a little change with 0 A.D. The 30th generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{30}= 1, 073, 741, 824 human beings.It is the turning point between 29th and 30th generations because the number of mankind exceeded a billion was 19th century. The 31st generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{31}= 2, 147, 483, 648 human beings.The 32nd generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{32}= 4, 294, 967, 296 human beings.The 33rd generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{33}= 8, 589, 934, 592 human beings.There were three steps turning points from the 30th to the 32nd generations during 100 years of the 20th century because the number of mankind reached to 1.9 billion at the beginning of the 20th century from a billion at the end of the 19th century and reached 6.1 billion at the end of he 20th century. It is expected that the number of mankind is estimated to exceed 10 billion during the 21st century whereas the number of current (2006) is exceeding 6.5 billion. The 34th generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{34}= 17, 179, 869, 184 human beings.Therefore, The turning point whether the 33rd new mankind appears would be 21st century. Chapter 32 Evolution in $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B The current year$B!G(Bs (2006) population is exceeding 6.5 billion. The 32nd generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{32}= 4, 294, 967, 296 human beings.The 33rd generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{33}= 8, 589, 934, 592 human beings.Therefore, We modern men are the 33rd generation. On the other hand, The dawn for a mankind was two legs Early Man (Homo erectus) 500,000 years ago, and before that time was not a mankind but the ape man (Australopithecus). The Old Man (Neanderthal) who was the 20th generation was born as one of mutation among the Early Man (Homo erectus). The 20th generation was born when the population was exceeding by 2 ^{20}= 1, 047, 576 human beings.A million of the Early Man (Homo erectus) and the Old Man (Neanderthal) lived together 290,000 years ago. Therefore, The history of a mankind has been evolving from the 19th generation who was the Early Man to the 32nd generation who is modern man 500,000 years ago. In other words, The evolution for a mankind has been made at fourteenth generation for 500,000 years. On the other hand, The evolution in $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B has been made at nineteenth generation during 13.7 billion years that was the birth of $B!F(Bmotion space of light and sound$B!G(B by the $B!F(Bbig bang$B!G(B and 500,000 years before. In other words, The history of $B!F(Bmotion space of light and sound$B!G(B by the $B!F(Bbig bang$B!G(B 13.7 billion years ago and the sun 5billion years ago and the earth 4.6 billion years ago and the life 3.6 billion years ago was condensed between 2 ^{0}= 1 one $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B to 2^{32}= 4, 294, 967, 296 human beings.Chapter 33 (Relative) FigureThe evolution for a mankind has been made at fourteenth generation for 500,000 years. On the other hand, The evolution in $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B has been made at nineteenth generation during 13.7 billion years and 500,000 years before. In other words, The history of $B!F(Bmotion space of light and sound$B!G(B by the $B!F(Bbig bang$B!G(B 13.7 billion years ago and the sun 5billion years ago and the earth 4.6 billion years ago and the life 3.6 billion years ago was condensed between 2 ^{0}= 1 one $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B to 2^{32}= 4, 294, 967, 296 human beings.Therefore, It has been evolving from 2 ^{0}= 1 one $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B to 2^{32}= 4, 294, 967, 296 human beings.The birth of 2 ^{0}= 1 one $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B is nothing but the$B!F(Bbig bang$B!G(B to make thingness from nothingness.In case of circular motion, it is the birth among birth/life/death. In case of pendulum (swing) motion, it is starting point of first motion that is the bottom point. In case of phase transition of H _{2}O (water), it is boiling point (100$B!n(B) for a condensing phenomenon$B!!(Bphase transited from steam to water.It is static point in static and motion $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B. It is a substantial view in substance $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B and image $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B. It is absolute view of the theory of absolute relativity. It is One among "One $B!A(B Two $B!A(BThree". It is neutral among minus/neutral/plus. It is 0 among -1/0/+1. It is 0 among 0/1/2. In other word, The figure of 0$B!&(B1$B!&(B2$B!&(B3$B!&(B4$B!&(B5$B!&(B6$B!&(B7$B!&(B8$B!&(B9$B!&(B10$B!&!&!&(B100$B!&!&!&(B1000$B!&!&!&(B we think is nothing but an exponent of 2 ^{0}$B!&(B2^{1}$B!&(B2^{2}$B!&(B2^{3}$B!&(B2^{4}$B!&(B2^{5}$B!&(B2^{6}$B!&(B2^{7}$B!&(B2^{8}$B!&(B2^{9}$B!&(B2^{10}$B!&!&!&(B2^{100}$B!&!&!&(B2^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B2^{(n)}.Our fundamental figure is (relative) figure 2. In other word, We human beings think dichotomy fundamentally. In other word, We human beings think relativism fundamentally. In other word, We human beings think motion fundamentally. In other word, We human beings think image fundamentally. On the other hand, Other creatures except human beings are being monism fundamentally. On the other hand, Other creatures except human beings are being absoluteness fundamentally. On the other hand, Other creatures except human beings are being stillness fundamentally. On the other hand, Other creatures except human beings are being substance fundamentally. We human beings misunderstand that we live in the horizontal world at past/present/future of flowing time. Other creatures except human beings live in the vertical world at "now & here". Chapter 34 (Absolute) FigureWe human beings think dichotomy fundamentally. We human beings think relativism fundamentally. We human beings think motion fundamentally. We human beings think image fundamentally. Therefore, Our fundamental figure is (relative) figure 2. Therefore, The figure of 0$B!&(B1$B!&(B2$B!&(B3$B!&(B4$B!&(B5$B!&(B6$B!&(B7$B!&(B8$B!&(B9$B!&(B10$B!&!&!&(B100$B!&!&!&(B1000$B!&!&!&(B(n) we think is nothing but an exponent of 2 ^{0}$B!&(B2^{1}$B!&(B2^{2}$B!&(B2^{3}$B!&(B2^{4}$B!&(B2^{5}$B!&(B2^{6}$B!&(B2^{7}$B!&(B2^{8}$B!&(B2^{9}$B!&(B2^{10}$B!&!&!&(B2^{100}$B!&!&!&(B2^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B2^{(n)}.On the other hand, Other creatures except human beings are being monism fundamentally. Other creatures except human beings are being absoluteness fundamentally. Other creatures except human beings are being stillness fundamentally. Other creatures except human beings are being substance fundamentally. Therefore, Fundamental figure of other creatures except human beings is (absolute) figure 1. There is only one (absolute) figure 1 for other creatures that is 1 ^{0}$B!&(B1^{1}$B!&(B1^{2}$B!&(B1^{3}$B!&(B1^{4}$B!&(B1^{5}$B!&(B1^{6}$B!&(B1^{7}$B!&(B1^{8}$B!&(B1^{9}$B!&(B1^{10}$B!&!&!&(B1^{100}$B!&!&!&(B1^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B1^{(n)}.In other word, Other creatures except human beings don$B!G(Bt have any concept of figure. Therefore, The theory of relativity consists of (relative) figure 2. The law of absolute consists of (absolute) figure 1. Chapter 35 (Absolute relative) FigureThe theory of relativity consists of (relative) figure 2. The figure of 0$B!&(B1$B!&(B2$B!&(B3$B!&(B4$B!&(B5$B!&(B6$B!&(B7$B!&(B8$B!&(B9$B!&(B10$B!&!&!&(B100$B!&!&!&(B1000$B!&!&!&(B(n) which is an exponent of 2 ^{0}$B!&(B2^{1}$B!&(B2^{2}$B!&(B2^{3}$B!&(B2^{4}$B!&(B2^{5}$B!&(B2^{6}$B!&(B2^{7}$B!&(B2^{8}$B!&(B2^{9}$B!&(B2^{10}$B!&!&!&(B2^{100}$B!&!&!&(B2^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B2^{(n)} is (relative) figure.The law of absolute consists of (absolute) figure 1. 1 ^{0}$B!&(B1^{1}$B!&(B1^{2}$B!&(B1^{3}$B!&(B1^{4}$B!&(B1^{5}$B!&(B1^{6}$B!&(B1^{7}$B!&(B1^{8}$B!&(B1^{9}$B!&(B1^{10}$B!&!&!&(B1^{100}$B!&!&!&(B1^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B1^{(n)} which is absolute 1 is (absolute) figure.On the other hand, The theory of absolute relativity consists of (absolute relative) figure 3. 3 ^{0}$B!&(B3^{1}$B!&(B3^{2}$B!&(B3^{3}$B!&(B3^{4}$B!&(B3^{5}$B!&(B3^{6}$B!&(B3^{7}$B!&(B3^{8}$B!&(B3^{9}$B!&(B3^{10}$B!&!&!&(B3^{100}$B!&!&!&(B3^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B3^{(n)} = (1+2)^{0}$B!&(B(1+2)^{1}$B!&(B(1+2)^{2}$B!&(B(1+2)^{3}$B!&(B(1+2)^{4}$B!&(B(1+2)^{5}$B!&(B(1+2)^{6}$B!&(B(1+2)^{7}$B!&(B(1+2)^{8}$B!&(B(1+2)^{9}$B!&(B(1+2)^{10}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{100}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{(n)} is (absolute relative) figure.Each common side is (absolute) figure 1 and unique side is (relative) figure 2 among "dichotomy" and "the law of relativity between whole and part" and "the way of being and the way of thinking". Unique side is a view in the law of absolute and common side is a view in the theory of relativity and the mixture of unique side and common side is a view in the theory of absolute relativity. In other word, The common side between "dichotomy" and "the law of relativity between whole and part" becomes the unique side between "the law of relativity between whole and part" and "the way of being and the way of thinking" and the unique side between "the law of relativity between whole and part" and "the way of being and the way of thinking" becomes the common side between "the way of being and the way of thinking" and "dichotomy". And, The unique side between "dichotomy" and "the law of relativity between whole and part" becomes the common side between "the law of relativity between whole and part" and "the way of being and the way of thinking" and the common side between "the law of relativity between whole and part" and "the way of being and the way of thinking" becomes the unique side between "the way of being and the way of thinking" and "dichotomy". In other word, 1 ^{(n)} is (absolute) figure and 2^{(n)} is (relative) figure and (n*1^{(n-1)} *2)$B!&!&!&(B(n*1*2^{(n-1)} ) is (absolute relative) figure in (1+2)^{0}$B!&(B(1+2)^{1}$B!&(B(1+2)^{2}$B!&(B(1+2)^{3}$B!&(B(1+2)^{4}$B!&(B(1+2)^{5}$B!&(B(1+2)^{6}$B!&(B(1+2)^{7}$B!&(B(1+2)^{8}$B!&(B(1+2)^{9}$B!&(B(1+2)^{10}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{100}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{(n)} .Chapter 36 The way of (Absolute relative) livingWe human beings think dichotomy fundamentally. We human beings think relativism fundamentally. We human beings think motion fundamentally. We human beings think image fundamentally. On the other hand, Other creatures except human beings are being monism fundamentally. Other creatures except human beings are being absoluteness fundamentally. Other creatures except human beings are being stillness fundamentally. Other creatures except human beings are being substance fundamentally. Therefore, We human beings should live on the basis of trinity which exceeds the way of thinking on the basis of dichotomy and the way of being on the basis of monism. Therefore, We human beings should live on the basis of absolute relativity which exceeds the way of thinking on the basis of relativism and the way of being on the basis of absolute. Therefore, We human beings should live on the basis of static motion which exceeds the way of thinking on the basis of motion and the way of being on the basis of stillness. Therefore, We human beings should live on the basis of substance image which exceeds the way of thinking on the basis of image and the way of being on the basis of substance. Chapter 37 The evolutionWe human beings should live on the basis of trinity which exceeds the way of thinking on the basis of dichotomy and the way of being on the basis of monism. We human beings should live on the basis of absolute relativity which exceeds the way of thinking on the basis of relativism and the way of being on the basis of absolute. We human beings should live on the basis of static motion which exceeds the way of thinking on the basis of motion and the way of being on the basis of stillness. We human beings should live on the basis of substance image which exceeds the way of thinking on the basis of image and the way of being on the basis of substance. In other word, "Monism" + "dichotomy" is evolving to "trinity". "Absoluteness" + "relativism" is evolving to "absolute relativity". "Stillness" + "motion" is evolving to "static motion". "Substance" + "image" is evolving to "substance image". In other word, (1 ^{0}$B!&(B1^{1}$B!&(B1^{2}$B!&(B1^{3}$B!&(B1^{4}$B!&(B1^{5}$B!&(B1^{6}$B!&(B1^{7}$B!&(B1^{8}$B!&(B1^{9}$B!&(B1^{10}$B!&!&!&(B1^{100}$B!&!&!&(B1^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B1^{(n)} ) + (2^{0}$B!&(B2^{1}$B!&(B2^{2}$B!&(B2^{3}$B!&(B2^{4}$B!&(B2^{5}$B!&(B2^{6}$B!&(B2^{7}$B!&(B2^{8}$B!&(B2^{9}$B!&(B2^{10}$B!&!&!&(B2^{100}$B!&!&!&(B2^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B2^{(n)} ) is evolving to [(1+2)^{0}$B!&(B(1+2)^{1}$B!&(B(1+2)^{2}$B!&(B(1+2)^{3}$B!&(B(1+2)^{4}$B!&(B(1+2)^{5}$B!&(B(1+2)^{6}$B!&(B(1+2)^{7}$B!&(B(1+2)^{8}$B!&(B(1+2)^{9}$B!&(B(1+2)^{10}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{100}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{(n)}] and an evolving coefficient is nothing but (n*1^{(n-1)} *2)$B!&!&!&(B(n*1*2^{(n-1)} ) which is nothing but 2(n).Therefore, "Monism" + "dichotomy" is not "trinity". "Absoluteness" + "relativism" is not "absolute relativity". "Stillness" + "motion" is not "static motion". "Substance" + "image" is not "substance image". Therefore, 1 + 2 is not 3 In other word, 1 + 2 is evolving to 3. In other word, "Exceeding" is "evolving". Chapter 38 An evolving coefficient"Monism" + "dichotomy" is evolving to "trinity". "Absoluteness" + "relativism" is evolving to "absolute relativity". "Stillness" + "motion" is evolving to "static motion". "Substance" + "image" is evolving to "substance image". In other word, "Monism" + "dichotomy" is not "trinity". "Absoluteness" + "relativism" is not "absolute relativity". "Stillness" + "motion" is not "static motion". "Substance" + "image" is not "substance image". 1 + 1 is not 2 1 + 1 is evolving to 2. (1 ^{0}$B!&(B1^{1}$B!&(B1^{2}$B!&(B1^{3}$B!&(B1^{4}$B!&(B1^{5}$B!&(B1^{6}$B!&(B1^{7}$B!&(B1^{8}$B!&(B1^{9}$B!&(B1^{10}$B!&!&!&(B1^{100}$B!&!&!&(B1^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B1^{(n)} ) + (1^{0}$B!&(B1^{1}$B!&(B1^{2}$B!&(B1^{3}$B!&(B1^{4}$B!&(B1^{5}$B!&(B1^{6}$B!&(B1^{7}$B!&(B1^{8}$B!&(B1^{9}$B!&(B1^{10}$B!&!&!&(B1^{100}$B!&!&!&(B1^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B1^{(n)} ) is evolving to [(1+1)^{0}$B!&(B(1+1)^{1}$B!&(B(1+1)^{2}$B!&(B(1+1)^{3}$B!&(B(1+1)^{4}$B!&(B(1+1)^{5}$B!&(B(1+1)^{6}$B!&(B(1+1)^{7}$B!&(B(1+1)^{8}$B!&(B(1+1)^{9}$B!&(B(1+1)^{10}$B!&!&!&(B(1+1)^{100}$B!&!&!&(B(1+1)^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B(1+1)^{(n)}] and an evolving coefficient is (n*1^{(n-1)} *1)$B!&!&!&(B(n*1*1^{(n-1)} ) which is nothing but (n).Therefore, 1 + 2 is not 3 1 + 2 is evolving to 3. (1 ^{0}$B!&(B1^{1}$B!&(B1^{2}$B!&(B1^{3}$B!&(B1^{4}$B!&(B1^{5}$B!&(B1^{6}$B!&(B1^{7}$B!&(B1^{8}$B!&(B1^{9}$B!&(B1^{10}$B!&!&!&(B1^{100}$B!&!&!&(B1^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B1^{(n)} ) + (2^{0}$B!&(B2^{1}$B!&(B2^{2}$B!&(B2^{3}$B!&(B2^{4}$B!&(B2^{5}$B!&(B2^{6}$B!&(B2^{7}$B!&(B2^{8}$B!&(B2^{9}$B!&(B2^{10}$B!&!&!&(B2^{100}$B!&!&!&(B2^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B2^{(n)} ) is evolving to [(1+2)^{0}$B!&(B(1+2)^{1}$B!&(B(1+2)^{2}$B!&(B(1+2)^{3}$B!&(B(1+2)^{4}$B!&(B(1+2)^{5}$B!&(B(1+2)^{6}$B!&(B(1+2)^{7}$B!&(B(1+2)^{8}$B!&(B(1+2)^{9}$B!&(B(1+2)^{10}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{100}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{(n)}] and an evolving coefficient is nothing but (n*1^{(n-1)} *2)$B!&!&!&(B(n*1*2^{(n-1)} ) which is nothing but 2(n).Chapter 39 The world of radix (N) and exponent (N)All $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B is not the world of radix (N) but the world of exponent (N). Therefore, Finite $B!F(Bspace$B!F(B 13.7 billions light-years expanse - image $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B, motion $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B, relative $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B, $B!F(Bmotion space of light and sound$B!G(B - is not the world of radix 2(n) but the world of exponent (2 ^{(n)} ).Infinite $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B - substance $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B, static $B!F(Bspace$B!G(B, the absolute cosmos, $B!F(Bstatic space of darkness and silence$B!G(B is not the world of radix 1(n) but the world of exponent (1 ^{(n)} ).In other word, It is not the world of radix 1(n) but the world of exponent (1 ^{(n)}).It is not the world of radix 2(n) but the world of exponent (2 ^{(n)}).It is not the world of radix 3(n) but the world of exponent (3 ^{(n)}).Furthermore, 1 + 1 is not 2 1 + 1 is evolving to 2. (1 ^{0}$B!&(B1^{1}$B!&(B1^{2}$B!&(B1^{3}$B!&(B1^{4}$B!&(B1^{5}$B!&(B1^{6}$B!&(B1^{7}$B!&(B1^{8}$B!&(B1^{9}$B!&(B1^{10}$B!&!&!&(B1^{100}$B!&!&!&(B1^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B1^{(n)} ) + (1^{0}$B!&(B1^{1}$B!&(B1^{2}$B!&(B1^{3}$B!&(B1^{4}$B!&(B1^{5}$B!&(B1^{6}$B!&(B1^{7}$B!&(B1^{8}$B!&(B1^{9}$B!&(B1^{10}$B!&!&!&(B1^{100}$B!&!&!&(B1^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B1^{(n)} ) is evolving to [(1+1)^{0}$B!&(B(1+1)^{1}$B!&(B(1+1)^{2}$B!&(B(1+1)^{3}$B!&(B(1+1)^{4}$B!&(B(1+1)^{5}$B!&(B(1+1)^{6}$B!&(B(1+1)^{7}$B!&(B(1+1)^{8}$B!&(B(1+1)^{9}$B!&(B(1+1)^{10}$B!&!&!&(B(1+1)^{100}$B!&!&!&(B(1+1)^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B(1+1)^{(n)}] and an evolving coefficient is (n*1^{(n-1)} *1)$B!&!&!&(B(n*1*1^{(n-1)} ) which is nothing but (n).Furthermore, 1 + 2 is not 3 1 + 2 is evolving to 3. (1 ^{0}$B!&(B1^{1}$B!&(B1^{2}$B!&(B1^{3}$B!&(B1^{4}$B!&(B1^{5}$B!&(B1^{6}$B!&(B1^{7}$B!&(B1^{8}$B!&(B1^{9}$B!&(B1^{10}$B!&!&!&(B1^{100}$B!&!&!&(B1^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B1^{(n)} ) + (2^{0}$B!&(B2^{1}$B!&(B2^{2}$B!&(B2^{3}$B!&(B2^{4}$B!&(B2^{5}$B!&(B2^{6}$B!&(B2^{7}$B!&(B2^{8}$B!&(B2^{9}$B!&(B2^{10}$B!&!&!&(B2^{100}$B!&!&!&(B2^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B2^{(n)} ) is evolving to [(1+2)^{0}$B!&(B(1+2)^{1}$B!&(B(1+2)^{2}$B!&(B(1+2)^{3}$B!&(B(1+2)^{4}$B!&(B(1+2)^{5}$B!&(B(1+2)^{6}$B!&(B(1+2)^{7}$B!&(B(1+2)^{8}$B!&(B(1+2)^{9}$B!&(B(1+2)^{10}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{100}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{(n)}] and an evolving coefficient is nothing but (n*1^{(n-1)} *2)$B!&!&!&(B(n*1*2^{(n-1)} ) which is nothing but 2(n).Therefore, It is not the world of radix 1(n) but the world of exponent (1 ^{(n)}).It is not the world of radix (1+1) (n) but the world of exponent (1+1) ^{(n)}.It is not the world of radix (1+2) (n) but the world of exponent (1+2) ^{(n)}.As a result, It is not the world of (a ^{2}+b^{2}) but the world of exponent (a+b)^{2} and 2ab is an evolving coefficient.It is not the world of (a ^{3}+b^{3}) but the world of exponent (a+b)^{3} and (3ab^{2}+3a^{2}b) is an evolving coefficient.It is not the world of (a ^{2}+b^{2}+c^{2}) but the world of exponent (a+b+c)^{2} and (2ab + 2bc +2ca) is an evolving coefficient.It is not the world of (a ^{3}+b^{3}+c^{3}) but the world of exponent (a+b+c)^{3} and (3ab^{2}+3a^{2}b + 3bc^{2} +3b^{2}c + 3ca^{2} + 3c^{2} a+ 6abc) is an evolving coefficient.Chapter 40 An unique side (1) and common side (2)Each common side is (absolute) figure 1 and unique side is (relative) figure 2 among "dichotomy" and "the law of relativity between whole and part" and "the way of being and the way of thinking". Unique side is a view in the law of absolute and common side is a view in the theory of relativity and the mixture of unique side and common side is a view in the theory of absolute relativity. In other word, The common side between "dichotomy" and "the law of relativity between whole and part" becomes the unique side between "the law of relativity between whole and part" and "the way of being and the way of thinking" and the unique side between "the law of relativity between whole and part" and "the way of being and the way of thinking" becomes the common side between "the way of being and the way of thinking" and "dichotomy". And, The unique side between "dichotomy" and "the law of relativity between whole and part" becomes the common side between "the law of relativity between whole and part" and "the way of being and the way of thinking" and the common side between "the law of relativity between whole and part" and "the way of being and the way of thinking" becomes the unique side between "the way of being and the way of thinking" and "dichotomy". In other word, 1 ^{(n)} is (absolute) figure and 2^{(n)} is (relative) figure and (n*1^{(n-1)} *2)$B!&!&!&(B(n*1*2^{(n-1)} ) which is 2(n) is (absolute relative) figure in (1+2)^{0}$B!&(B(1+2)^{1}$B!&(B(1+2)^{2}$B!&(B(1+2)^{3}$B!&(B(1+2)^{4}$B!&(B(1+2)^{5}$B!&(B(1+2)^{6}$B!&(B(1+2)^{7}$B!&(B(1+2)^{8}$B!&(B(1+2)^{9}$B!&(B(1+2)^{10}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{100}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{(n)} .It is not the world of radix 1(n) but the world of exponent (1 ^{(n)}).It is not the world of radix (1+1) (n)but the world of exponent (1+1) ^{(n)}.It is not the world of radix (1+2) (n)but the world of exponent (1+2) ^{(n)}.It is not the world of (a ^{2}+b^{2}) but the world of exponent (a+b)^{2} and 2ab is an evolving coefficient.It is not the world of (a ^{3}+b^{3}) but the world of exponent (a+b)^{3} and (3ab^{2}+3a^{2}b) is an evolving coefficient.It is not the world of (a ^{2}+b^{2}+c^{2}) but the world of exponent (a+b+c)^{2} and (2ab + 2bc +2ca) is an evolving coefficient.It is not the world of (a ^{3}+b^{3}+c^{3}) but the world of exponent (a+b+c)^{3} and (3ab^{2}+3a^{2}b + 3bc^{2} +3b^{2}c + 3ca^{2} + 3c^{2}a+ 6abc) is an evolving coefficient.In other word, The surface area (two dimension) of three-dimensional cube is not (a ^{2}+b^{2}+c^{2}) but (2ab + 2bc +2ca) and the volume (three dimension) is not (a^{3}+b^{3}+c^{3}) but (3ab^{2}+3a^{2}b + 3bc^{2} +3b^{2}c + 3ca^{2} + 3c^{2}a+ 6abc) among "dichotomy (a*b)" and "the law of relativity between whole and part (b*c)" and "the way of being and the way of thinking (c*a)" is its proof.The universe has evolved on the basis of 2n kinds of natural number. However, The universe has evolved on the basis of 2n $B"*(B 2 ^{2}$B!!(B.What does it mean? This is entirely the proof that, To evolve is to change, And, To change is to move. Hence, Since the universe was born 13.7 billions years ago (2 ^{0}),Until the modern man reached it population by 6.9 billions (between 2 ^{32} & 2^{33}),The universe, The earth, The nature, has evolved on the basis of 2n $B"*(B 2 ^{2}$B!!(B.Then, The universe, The earth, The nature, Which has evolved on the basis of 2n $B"*(B 2 ^{2}$B!!(B has $B!H(Bthe law of seven$B!I(B functioning.First of all, The universe which was born of the absolute static universe 13.7 billions years ago by $B!H(Bbig-bang$B!I(B is the motion universe. In another expression, (1) The absolute static universe (2) The whole motion universe (3) The motion galaxy universe (4) The motion fixed star universe (5) The solar system motion universe (The planets) (6) The motion earth (planets) (7) The motion moon (satellites) And, (7) The motion moon (satellites) is the most advanced universe. It is because that, (7) The motion moon (satellites) has no child universe. This is entirely the proof that Universe has evolved by seventh steps. Hence, The absolute static universe on the basis of number 1 ^{0}$B!&(B1^{1}$B!&(B1^{2}$B!&(B1^{3}$B!&(B1^{4}$B!&(B1^{5}$B!&(B1^{6}$B!&(B1^{7}$B!&(B1^{8}$B!&(B1^{9}$B!&(B1^{10}$B!&!&!&(B1^{100}$B!&!&!&(B1^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B1^{(n)} is state of stillness.On the other hand, The relative motion universe on the basis of number 2 ^{0}$B!&(B2^{1}$B!&(B2^{2}$B!&(B2^{3}$B!&(B2^{4}$B!&(B2^{5}$B!&(B2^{6}$B!&(B2^{7}$B!&(B2^{8}$B!&(B2^{9}$B!&(B2^{10}$B!&!&!&(B2^{100}$B!&!&!&(B2^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B2^{(n)} is evolving (changing/moving).On the other hand, The absolute/relative universe on the basis of number (1+2) ^{0}$B!&(B(1+2)^{1}$B!&(B(1+2)^{2}$B!&(B(1+2)^{3}$B!&(B(1+2)^{4}$B!&(B(1+2)^{5}$B!&(B(1+2)^{6}$B!&(B(1+2)^{7}$B!&(B(1+2)^{8}$B!&(B(1+2)^{9}$B!&(B(1+2)^{10}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{100}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{1000}$B!&!&!&(B(1+2)^{ (n)} is evolving.Hence, 1+2 is not 3, But, 1+2 is evolving into 3. This is entirely the fact that, The world of absolute number (1 ^{(n)})+ The world of relative number of (2 ^{(n)})$B"*(B The world of absolute/relative number of (3 ^{(n)}) which is evolving.Therefore, The finite prime number of Zero, One, 2, 3, 5, 7$B!&!&!&(B(n), (n+1) $B!&!&!&(BOne, Zero is circular moving just like Zero (the starting point), absolute number (1 ^{(n)}), relative number of (2^{(n)}), absolute/relative number (3^{(n)}), relative number of (2^{(n)}), absolute number (1^{(n)}), Zero (the ending point).And, The infinite prime number is nothing but $B!&!&!&(B3, 5, 7$B!&!&!&(Bamong the finite prime number of 0, 1, 2$B!&!&!&(B3, 5, 7$B!&!&!&(B2, 1, 0. This is entirely the reason of $B!H(Bthe law of seven$B!I(B. Hence, The real prime number is not 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B but $B!&!&!&(B3, 5, 7$B!&!&!&(B. This is entirely the reason why 2 among of the conventional prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(Bhas been treated in special. Then, We will be able to find out the principle of the twin prime number if we exclude other prime number than twin primes. Then, 2 is only even number among all prime number and all others are odd number. Then, You can be reminded of the definition of prime number. The prime number is bigger than 1 and can be divided by 1 and itself but can not be divided by any other number. In another expression, Even number must be surely divided by 2. Hence, The real prime number is not 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(B but $B!&!&!&(B3, 5, 7$B!&!&!&(B. Then, There is prime triplet which is to be 1 between three kinds of prime number is just 3, 5, 7. And, This is entirely the proof as below. One of prime triplet is to be placed as (2n + 1), (2n + 3), (2n + 5) subject to (n) is natural number. (1) If (2n + 1) $B"a(B 1(mod 3) Then, (2n + 3) $B"a(B 0(mod 3) which is multiples of 3 and it is not the prime number. (1) If (2n + 1) $B"a(B 2(mod 3) Then, (2n + 5) $B"a(B 0(mod 3) which is multiples of 3 and it is not the prime number. (3) (2n + 1) should be multiples of 3 of which the prime number is only 3 from (1) and (2). Therefore, There is only one prime triplet with 3, 5, 7 from above (1), (2), (3). This is entirely the fact that, The proof of contradiction was used by proving that the prime number exists infinitely by Eukleides Euclid on the basis of natural number of (n). And, The proof of contradiction was used by proving that the prime triplet is only (3, 5, 7) on the basis of natural number of (n). This is entirely the proof that, To say about the one-dimensional straight line mathematics is nothing but to go for wool and come home shorn. On the other hand, It is claimed that not only the prime number but also the twin prime number exist infinitely. Then, Let$B!G(Bs list up all twin prime numbers among up to 100 of natural number. 3, 5 5, 7 11, 13 17, 19 29, 31 41, 43 59, 61 71, 73 And, The biggest twin number up to now is 65, 516, 468, 355 X 2 ^{333,333} $B!^(B 1.Incidentally, The biggest prime number which was discovered is 2 ^{43,112,609} $B!](B1.In other words, The biggest prime number which was discovered is 12,978,189 figures. On the other hand, The biggest twin prime number which was discovered is 100,355 figures. Eventually, In summing up the assertion of modern scientists is as below, (1) The natural number of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10$B!&!&!&(Bn, (n+1) exists infinitely. (2) The prime number of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11$B!&!&!&(Balso exists infinitely but not found how to express. Known biggest prime number up to now is 12,978,189 figures of 2 ^{43,112,609} $B!](B1.(3) The twin prime number is, 3, 5 5, 7 11, 13 17, 19 29, 31 41, 43 59, 61 71, 73$B!&!&!&(B Known biggest twin number up to now is 100,355 figures of 65, 516, 468, 355 X 2 ^{333,333} $B!^(B 1.(4) The prime triplet is just one 3, 5, 7. In final, The basic natural number of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10$B!&!&!&(Bn, (n+1) is nothing but 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9. And, 0 is Zero which is fundamental of fundamentals of number. 1 is One which is application of fundamentals of number and the basic odd number. 2 is fundamental of even number. 4, 6, 8 is application of applications of composite number and basic even number. 9 is application of applications of composite number and basic odd number. 3, 5, 7 is only one prime triplet. This is entirely the fact that above 10 numbers is the fundamental of the concept of number which has nothing to do with the universe, the earth and the nature forged by men. - End -. |