Recommendation of weak
At the beginning

The natural world is applied to the theory of natural selection.
In other words,
It is the world where the stronger prey upon the weaker.
This is indeed the world of to eat or to be eaten.
Then which one is the foundation to eat or to be eaten?
Is to eat foundation?
Or,
Is to be eaten foundation?
This is indeed the same theory of which one is foundation egg or chicken?
We could not find any answer to the question rationally.
However,
We are sure that egg is foundation experimentally.
It is because all animals had exterminated after the time of dinosaurs.
In other words,
This is indeed the proof that once the stronger has won not only the weaker but also the stronger are all exterminated.
In paradoxically saying,
Cannibalism is never happening even if the weaker has won and the stronger is exterminated.
This is indeed the proof that the raison d'etre of the stronger is cannibalism.
On the contrary,
This is indeed the proof that the raison d'etre of the weaker is no-cannibalism.
Thus,
To be eaten is foundation in the world of to eat or to be eaten.
In other words,
The weaker is foundation in the world where the stronger prey upon the weaker.
This is indeed the reason why “recommendation of weak” is written.


May 12 2010 Satoshi Nitta


Chapter 1 Dinosaurs in the modern times
Chapter 2 Who is culprit?
Chapter 3 Winner & Loser
Chapter 4 History with words (There was word in the beginning)
Chapter 5 There was sound in the beginning
Chapter 6 Words = Relative monism of utilitarianism
Chapter 7 Beyond idea
Chapter 8 Right now & Immediately (at moment)
Chapter 9 Dichotomy = Antonym & Trilism = Synonym
Chapter 10 Mankind does not know about the true love
Chapter 11 Lecherous young Japanese girls
Chapter 12 Modern man with suspicious mind
Chapter 13 Sly modern man
Chapter 14 Modern man without the word of “poverty”
Chapter 15 Modern man without the word of “poverty”


At the end

My book “Daily discourse” Dialogue 308 [Weak of dualism for strong and weak is real virtue of “graceful”] is quoted as below.
This is indeed the reason why “Recommendation of weak”.

May 26 2010 Satoshi Nitta



The meaning of “right” and “wrong” is opposite which is antonym in the society of common sense till 20th century.
Therefore,
We human beings fell into the trap of “relative monism of utilitarianism” such as “right is virtue and wrong is evil”.
My book [A life through Reality] Chapter894 “Weak of dualism for strong and weak is real virtue of “graceful”” talked that weak is substance and strong is just an absent concept of weak and substantial weak is nothing but real virtue of “graceful”.
My book [A life through Reality] Chapter894 “Weak of dualism for strong and weak is real virtue of “graceful”” is quoted as below.

Lion, the king of beast is the master of the strong.
They are taking knap without any worry in the right middle of savanna of Africa.
This is typical attitude of the strong.
The attitude of mankind who were always worrying about in all directions and finally became to live with two-leg style was quite different from the attitude of lion.
The attitude of mankind is typical attitude of the weak.
Lion who’s attitude is typical strong is constrained into only the savanna of Africa and mankind who’s attitude is typical weak conquered the earth.
Dualism for strong and weak such as lion, the master of the strong and mankind, the master of the weak shows that weak is substance and strong is just absent concept of weak.
Dualism for strong and weak is expanded into pseudo dualism for ABC condition on weak (graceful).
Lion is who is the master of strong is nothing but “(A) condition on weak (graceful)” and mankind who is the master of weak is nothing but “(C) condition on weak (graceful)”.
Is mankind who lives with “relative monism of utilitarianism” in believing that “strong is virtue and weak is evil” real strong while he is fearful standing before lion?
Is man who is fearful standing before Mafia real strong?
The difference between real strong lion and pseudo strong mankind is who is “graceful”.
Real strong lion never chooses the one to fight.
Male lions who are fighting to take the seat of “boss” have “graceful”.
Pseudo strong Mafia always chooses the one to fight.
Those who can fight without weapon are real strong and those who can not fight without weapon are pseudo strong.
America is nothing but pseudo strong country because they can not fight without modern weapon and atomic bomb although they call themselves as police nation for the world.
If they are sacred police nation for the world they have to fight with Iraq without weapon.
If they were sacred police nation for the world they should have to fight with Japan without atomic bomb.
This is the proof that America is pseudo strong country.
The human society with United Nation in which there is permanent member of Security Council who can have the right to own atomic bomb is nothing but pseudo strong Mafia society.
The country who is “(A) condition on weak (graceful)” is real strong and the country who is “(C) condition on weak (graceful)” is pseudo strong.
However we human beings living in pseudo strong Mafia society believe in “relative monism of utilitarianism” such as “strong is virtue and weak is evil” and don’t understand that strong of pseudo dualism for strong and weak is nothing but “(C) condition on weak (graceful)”.
Real strong is nothing but the one who have the most weak (graceful).
Pseudo strong is nothing but the one who have the least weak (graceful).
Weak is nothing but real virtue of “graceful”.
Pseudo strong Mafia country is using modern weapons and real strong country is using suicide bomb in Iraq War and Palestine issue.
Who is real strong lion country?
The reason why real king is called “lion in desert” in Arabic countries is because lion is real strong.