Recommendation of fool
At the beginning

The word of “silly” originally does not come from foolishness but from flattery which is something compliment.
On the other hand,
The word of “fool” originally comes from neglect which is something insufficient or imperfect.
That is why the meaning of “silly” and “fool” are not same.
Thus,
“Fool” = imperfect,
And,
“Wise” = perfect,
are two aspects of same coin.
In other words,
It is perfect/imperfect dualism originally.
It is not wise/silly dualism.
Thus,
“Recommendation of fool” is not “recommendation of silly” but “recommendation of imperfectness”.
In other words,
It is not “recommendation of flattery”,
But,
It is “recommendation of ordinariness”.


May 2 2010 Satoshi Nitta


Chapter 1 Major matter & Minor matter
Chapter 2 Major fool & Minor fool
Chapter 3 Conscious & Unconscious
Chapter 4 To murder is not evil
Chapter 5 To murder with unconscious is evil
Chapter 6 Rule is to be broken
Chapter 7 Foundation of life = Continuation
Chapter 8 Continuation = rule of earth
Chapter 9 Continuation = law of universe = circular motion
Chapter 10 “Recommendation of wise” is self-contradiction


At the end

Continuation is the foundation of life.
And,
To live a life is nothing but to survive.
And,
To survive is nothing but self-protection.
Then,
Continuation is nothing but self-protection.
And,
Self-protection is nothing but the natural law of food chain which is “to eat or to be eaten”.
In other words,
It is nothing but the rule of nature.
In other words,
It is nothing but the law of earth.
In other words,
It is nothing but the law of solar system.
In other words,
It is nothing but the law of Galaxy.
In other words,
It is nothing but the law of universe.
Then,
Continuation is nothing but circular motion which is the law of universe.
This is indeed the fact that why all creations in the natural society have to repeat all of rules of the earth is because they follow the circular motion which is the law of universe.
And,
The more foolish person is the more complete effort of continuation he does.
This is indeed the proof that,
It is not “recommendation of flattery”,
But,
It is “recommendation of ordinariness”.


May 11 2010 Satoshi Nitta